In new movie, the South started the Korean War, as Pyongyang has always claimed — Radio Free Asia
Early on June 25, 1950, 75,000 Korean People’s Army troops attacked, catching the South Korean Army by surprise and starting the Korean War. Three days later, Seoul fell to the Communist North.
But the new hit North Korean movie, “72 Hours,” tells a different story of how the three-year-long conflict started.
Produced by the Propaganda and Agitation Department of the country’s Central Committee, the film has the South attacking first, and the North’s advance to Seoul is part of a counter offensive, a resident of the northeastern province of North Hamgyong told RFA Korean on condition of anonymity for security reasons.
This account falls in line with Pyongyang’s official version of events – that it was the South that provoked the war under the orders of the United States, and that Washington wanted the war as an excuse to send troops to Korea to “conquer” the entire peninsula.
The movie is proving popular, largely because its production quality is higher than most made in North Korea, the resident said.
“People know it is ideological, but it is very entertaining,” the resident said.
Viewers seem enthused about the film even though they know it is propaganda, a resident of the northwestern province of North Pyongan told RFA.
Rare homegrown hit
It was in production for more than two years, and it was made specifically to paint the South Koreans as the enemy, he said.
RFA was not able to confirm the plot or other details about the film, which was released in February.
The movie is proving a rare homegrown hit for North Koreans, many of whom secretly watch South Korean TV shows and movies.
“There are not many North Korean movies worth watching, so residents usually prefer South Korean and foreign movies,” the first resident said.
South Korean and foreign media are smuggled into the country on SD cards and USB flash drives, but distributing or viewing the media is illegal, and citizens have been punished, or even executed, for getting caught watching or selling it.
An estimated 2-3 million Koreans died in the war, and the North ended up with slightly less territory than it had at the start, but North Korea claims it was victorious in what it now refers to as the “Great Fatherland Liberation War.”
At the beginning, though, the rapid advance of the Korean People’s Army suggested that the Communist forces would swiftly defeat the South.
As depicted in the film, Seoul’s first fall – the capital changed hands four times – is an inspiring story of brave men fighting a fierce three-day battle to “liberate” the city, the first resident said.
Pricey tickets
But not everyone can afford to see the movie, he said.
Authorities originally set ticket prices at 18,000 won (US$2.12) when the film was released, he said, an enormous sum that equals about half a month’s salary for the lowest paid government-assigned jobs. The price was later cut to 5,000 won (59 U.S. cents).
The exact production costs are not known, but rumors are spreading among residents that the film’s long run in theaters is because it hasn’t yet recouped those costs, the second resident said.
Those who can’t afford to watch are eagerly awaiting the film’s TV release, as that’s what usually happens to all North Korean propaganda films, the sources said. But rumors are circulating that “72 Hours” will be sold on VCD before that, yet another way to generate revenue.
“Even though the ticket price was lowered to 5,000 won … it is more important for residents to buy a kilogram (2.2 pounds) of rice for 6,000 won (70 U.S. cents) than to spend 5,000 on a movie ticket,” the North Pyongan resident said.
Authorities are also taking measures to prevent people from taking videos or pictures of the movie on their cell phones, saying that the ban is to prevent people from taking videos of national founder Kim Il Sung, even though the role is portrayed by an actor, he said.
“Residents who watched the movie left the theater wondering, ‘If we had won the war and occupied South Korea back then, what would Korea be like now?’”
Translated by Claire S. Lee. Edited by Eugene Whong and Malcolm Foster.
Related articles
'The Apprentice,' about a young Donald Trump, premieres in Cannes
CANNES, France (AP) — While Donald Trump’s hush money trial entered its sixth week in New York, an o2024-05-22What to expect at two sessions in pivotal year
The upcoming annual sessions of China's top legislature and political advisory body will offer the w2024-05-22Empower youths to bridge rural digital divide
JIN DING/CHINA DAILYSafeguarding the livelihood of China's smallholder farmers, who account for 90 p2024-05-22West accused of dragging Russia into arms race
Western countries attempted to draw Russia into an arms race while seeking to weaken it from within,2024-05-22Lynn Williams breaks NWSL goal
Lynn Williams scored her 79th league goal, becoming the National Women’s Soccer League all-time scor2024-05-22Continued evolution of law improves governing capacity
The modernization and capacity of China's governance system have been improved, thanks to the modifi2024-05-22
atest comment